Comments on: Is Ambiguity ‘Better’ Than Clarity in Art?

By: elmleblanc

elmleblanc — Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:52:38 +0000

Chauffe eau: Gamm’absolue, horizontale et également affermi. Resistance blindee ou bien steatite mouvant au colique.

By: Cindie Ugolini

Cindie Ugolini — Thu, 08 Dec 2011 12:13:57 +0000

love the blog, thanks for sharing your thoughts

By: best software development company

best software development company — Sat, 26 Nov 2011 17:38:52 +0000

I am really adoring the particular theme/design of one’s website. Ever run into any internet browser compatibility problems? A few my personal weblog market have got hated my personal website not running appropriately in Explorer however looks excellent in Chrome. Have you got any tips to help repair this challenge?

By: zaproszenia na roczek

zaproszenia na roczek — Fri, 18 Nov 2011 02:10:19 +0000

Thank you, I have just been searching for information about this topic for ages and yours is the greatest I’ve discovered so far. But, what about the bottom line? Are you sure about the source?

By: Kredyty mieszkaniowe - porównanie

Kredyty mieszkaniowe - porównanie — Wed, 16 Nov 2011 05:11:42 +0000

My brother recommended I might like this web site. He was entirely right. This post truly made my day. You can not imagine simply how much time I had spent for this info! Thanks!

By: Presto pressure cooker

Presto pressure cooker — Sun, 13 Nov 2011 16:09:42 +0000

I’m really enjoying the theme/design of your web site. Do you ever run into any web browser compatibility problems? A few of my blog visitors have complained about my blog not working correctly in Explorer but looks great in Safari. Do you have any solutions to help fix this issue?

By: windshield replacement phoeninx

windshield replacement phoeninx — Sun, 13 Nov 2011 00:23:54 +0000

Please let me know if you’re looking for a author for your blog. You have some really good articles and I feel I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d love to write some articles for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please send me an e-mail if interested. Many thanks!

By: Noleen

Noleen — Sat, 05 Nov 2011 18:20:14 +0000

Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wished to say that I’ve truly enjoyed surfing around your blog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing to your rss feed and I hope you write again very soon!

By: Becky4

Becky4 — Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:59:19 +0000

I’ve also been thinking the very same idea myself recently. Delighted to see an individual on the same wavelength! Nice article.

By: Tania

Tania — Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:01:57 +0000

I’ve read this post, and the comments, with a good deal of interest, and thought I would weigh in with my two ‘bits:
I have degrees in Fine Art and Art History (not that this makes my opinion any more valid - I’m just trying to provide a bit of context for my take on this conversation) and I think that many of the non-artist art collectors I’ve met have been drawn to abstract and non-objective art because it is valued by the “art experts” i.e. art critics and art historians.
If art criticism is the “description, analysis and interpretation of art” http://www.sasked.gov.sk.ca/docs/artsed/visart102030/vaglos.html then I honestly believe that anyone who can see and think is eminently well qualified to tell you what s/he sees when looking at art and what thoughts/feelings it raises for him/her. However, the preconception (or, perhaps, misconception?) many people have with abstract and non-representational art is that while anyone can tell you how a work of art makes him/her feel, only an art critic/historian will be able to make an intelligent commentary on what a work of art “means”.
And as long as people continue to believe this, I think there be a large population of art collectors who will allow art experts to convince them that abstract and non-representational art is valuable because it is the very art form that “requires” expert interpretation.